![]() |
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
|
Technical Explanation of the ETI Legislation
Congress
Repeals FSC Legislation
President
Clinton approves new Extraterritorial Income (ETI) exclusion tax regime
for U.S. and foreign manufacturing income On
November 15, 2000, President Clinton approved the FSC Repeal and
Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act of 2000 (the Act). The Act (H.R. 4986) was drafted
by members of the Treasury Department and the Joint Committee on
Taxation. The President
remarked that passage of the FSC replacement legislation was the result
of bipartisan support in Congress.
The Act is intended to assure the U.S. business community that
comparable tax benefits are available under the ETI tax regime and that
the record-keeping requirements will be simplified. On the other side of the
Atlantic, recent statements from Commissioner Lamy at the European Union
indicate that the FSC replacement legislation is not WTO-compatible, so
further negotiations are expected. As a
concession to its trading partners and the World Trade Organization (WTO),
the Act repeals Secs. 921-927 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the
Code), effective September 30, 2000.
These sections contain the operative statutory FSC provisions. Presumably, conforming amendments will be made to other
provisions in the Code under the foreign tax credit, Subpart F, expense
apportionment and dividend received deduction rules to eliminate
references to the FSC. Tax Benefits of ETI Exclusion LegislationAs an alternative, the Act implements the extraterritorial
income (ETI) exclusion. The
exclusion provides U.S. manufacturers with a 5.25% reduction in their
U.S. tax rate on ETI. The benefits of the ETI exclusion are expected to mirror the
current benefits under the FSC provisions, only the ETI exclusion should
apply to more U.S. taxpayers The Act reflects the acceptance of the WTO decision against
FSCs. Remarks by Treasury Secretary Eizenstat indicate that the U.S. has
complied with the complaints raised by the European Union (EU) at the
WTO hearings last year. In addition, based on Eizenstat’s explanation, the Act is
WTO-compliant. The
following points were cited: ·
the exclusion applies to all U.S. taxpayers, so there is no
subsidy or revenue “foregone” that is otherwise due, ·
foreign and U.S. manufactured goods are eligible for the
exclusion, so benefits are not contingent upon export, · no incentives are provided for the use of low or no-tax jurisdictions, and formulary pricing rules are eliminated
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||